Prejudice

A Politico-Psychological Analysis

Report generated

February 26, 2026

1 Study Characteristics

1.1 Items: Prejudice

Two facets:
- Homo-negativity
- Symbolic Racism

Items

Facet Item Item Description
Homo-negativity homo-negativity1 Gay men should stop shoving their lifestyles down people’s throats
homo-negativity2 Homosexuals have become far too confrontational in their demand for equal rights
homo-negativity3 Many lesbian women use their sexual orientation so that they can obtain special privileges
Symbolic Racism racism1 Blacks have become far too confrontational in their demand for equal rights
racism2 It is easy to understand the anger of Black people in America
racism3 Social movements such as ‘Black Lives Matters’ are detrimental to society
racism4 There is a lot of discrimination against Blacks in America today, which limits their chances to get ahead


Possible values:
Strongly agree (1) - Neither agree nor disagree (5) - Strongly disagree (9)

1.2 Samples 2016

N=1500

To conduct a exploratory and a confirmatory large surveys during the general election, we hired a professional survey firm (SSI, a US-based market research company that recruits participants from a panel of 7,139,027 American citizens; more information can be found at www.surveysampling.com (now https://www.dynata.com/) to recruit a nationally representative sample of 1,500 Americans (50.7% women) who completed study materials during the general election from August 16-September 9, 2016. (Information about sampling and exclusion criteria is included in the Supplement). The age distribution was as follows: 18-24 (12.9%), 25-34 (17.6%), 35-44 (17.5%), 45-54 (19.5%), 55-65 (15.6%) and older than 65 (16.9%). The ethnic breakdown was: White/European American (82.5%), Black/African American (7.7%), Latino (5.9%) and “Other” (4.0%). Concerning religion, 67.6% identified as Christian, 17.1% as religiously affiliated but not Christian, and 15.3% as Atheist/Agnostic. With respect to education 35.1% indicated “high school only or lower,” 31.4 % indicated “some college,” and 33.6% indicated having received a “Bachelor” or “Graduate” degree. 2424 participants were directed to the survey,1885 of which finished the survey (attrition rate 22%).

We followed recommendations to minimize the problem of careless responding in online studies. Specifically, we employed 10 random attention questions and time controls to check for data quality. There were 385 participants who failed more than one attention check or finished the survey in under ~22 minutes and were therefore excluded from the sample. For the 1500 participants who successfully finished the survey, completion time was 67 minutes on average (MD: 51min).

N=2119

Also through SSI we also recruited 2,119 American adults (21.5% women), who completed study materials from August 20-September 13, 2016. (Information about sampling and exclusion criteria is included in the Supplement). Age was distributed as follows: 18-24 (9.1%), 25-34 (13.8%), 35-44 (11.4%), 45-54 (2.7%), 55-65(3.6%), 65 and older (59.3%). The ethnic breakdown was: White/European American (85.9%), Black/African American (5.1%), Latino (4.1%), and “Other” (5.0%). In terms of religion, 70.7% identified as Christian, 15.7% as religiously affiliated but not Christian, and 13.7% as Atheist/Agnostic. With respect to educational status, 16.2% chose “high school or lower,” 40.4% reported “some college” and 43.4% had attained a “Bachelor” or “Graduate” degree. The median income category was $50,000-$74,999. 3425 participants were directed to the survey, 2,262 of which finished the survey (attrition rate 22 %).

We followed recommendations to minimize the problem of careless responding in online studies (Meade & Craig, 2012). Specifically, we employed 10 random attention questions and time controls to check for data quality. There were 543 participants who failed more than one attention check or finished the survey in under ~22 minutes and were therefore excluded from the sample. For the 2,119 participants who successfully finished the survey, completion time was 92 minutes on average (MD: 57min).

2 Descriptives

2.1 Means, SD, Range, & SE

Descriptives for Prejudice, Construct and Facets
vars n mean sd median min max range se
Homo_negativity_mean 1 1500 4.98 2.68 5.00 1 9 8 0.07
Symbolic_Racism_mean 2 1500 4.58 1.13 4.75 1 9 8 0.03
Descriptives for Prejudice at Item Level
n mean sd median min max range se
Homo_negativity1 1500 4.57 2.89 5.00 1 9.00 8.00 0.07
Homo_negativity2 1500 4.99 2.91 5.00 1 9.00 8.00 0.08
Homo_negativity3 1500 5.37 2.76 5.00 1 9.00 8.00 0.07
Symbolic_Racism1 1500 4.18 2.62 4.00 1 9.00 8.00 0.07
Symbolic_Racism2 1500 4.85 2.68 5.00 1 9.00 8.00 0.07
Symbolic_Racism3 1500 4.26 2.77 4.00 1 9.00 8.00 0.07
Symbolic_Racism4 1500 5.03 2.62 5.00 1 9.00 8.00 0.07
Prejudice 1500 4.75 1.38 4.86 1 8.43 7.43 0.04
Homo_negativity_mean 1500 4.98 2.68 5.00 1 9.00 8.00 0.07
Symbolic_Racism_mean 1500 4.58 1.13 4.75 1 9.00 8.00 0.03

2.2 Likert scale distribution

2.3 Distributions

2.4 Correlations

2.4.1 Correlation Plots

2.4.2 PIDF

2.4.3 Correlation Matrix



3 Demographics

3.1 Social Class




Note on the Raincloud Plots

  • Statistical summary (top): Welch’s t-test (or ANOVA) results, effect size, confidence intervals, p-values, and sample sizes are shown above each plot.
  • Bayesian analysis (bottom): Log Bayes factor and credible intervals are reported below each plot.



Homo_negativity grouped by SES
SES N Mean SD
Poor 38 -0.18 1.13
Lower Middle Class 298 0.07 0.99
Middle Middle Class 679 -0.04 1.01
Upper Middle Class 395 0.02 0.98
Rich 90 0.06 0.97
Symbolic_Racism grouped by SES
SES N Mean SD
Poor 38 0.19 0.86
Lower Middle Class 298 -0.07 1.07
Middle Middle Class 679 0.00 1.03
Upper Middle Class 395 0.04 0.91
Rich 90 0.00 0.99



3.2 Gender




Homo_negativity grouped by Sex
Sex N Mean SD
Male 740 -0.25 0.93
Female 760 0.25 1.00
Symbolic_Racism grouped by Sex
Sex N Mean SD
Male 740 -0.03 1.01
Female 760 0.03 0.99



3.3 Age




Homo_negativity grouped by Age
Age N Mean SD
18-24 years 193 0.19 0.95
25-34 years 264 0.30 0.98
35-44 years 263 0.16 1.02
45-54 years 292 -0.06 0.95
55-64 years 234 -0.07 0.97
65+ 254 -0.49 0.93
Symbolic_Racism grouped by Age
Age N Mean SD
18-24 years 193 -0.01 1.03
25-34 years 264 0.05 0.96
35-44 years 263 -0.06 1.04
45-54 years 292 0.02 1.05
55-64 years 234 0.07 0.91
65+ 254 -0.06 1.00



3.4 Education




Homo_negativity grouped by Education
Edu N Mean SD
Less than High School 51 -0.02 1.07
High School 475 -0.05 0.98
Some College 471 -0.01 1.03
Bachelor 310 0.04 0.97
Graduate 193 0.10 1.00
Symbolic_Racism grouped by Education
Edu N Mean SD
Less than High School 51 -0.07 0.98
High School 475 -0.03 1.09
Some College 471 -0.03 1.01
Bachelor 310 0.09 0.84
Graduate 193 0.00 0.97



3.5 Income Levels




Homo_negativity grouped by Income Levels
Income N Mean SD
Less than $15,000 178 0.00 1.03
$15,000-$24,999 180 -0.01 1.05
$25,000-$34,999 176 -0.02 1.03
$35,000-$49,999 227 0.01 1.00
$50,000-$74,999 292 0.08 1.00
$75,000-$99,999 192 -0.06 0.93
$100,000-$149,999 160 -0.03 1.01
$150,000 + 95 -0.03 0.95
Symbolic_Racism grouped by Income Levels
Income N Mean SD
Less than $15,000 178 -0.07 0.99
$15,000-$24,999 180 -0.03 1.07
$25,000-$34,999 176 -0.02 1.06
$35,000-$49,999 227 -0.10 0.97
$50,000-$74,999 292 0.03 0.99
$75,000-$99,999 192 0.10 0.92
$100,000-$149,999 160 -0.01 1.11
$150,000 + 95 0.15 0.80



3.6 Ethnicity




Homo_negativity grouped by Ethnicity
Ethnicity N Mean SD
Caucasian/European origin 1237 -0.04 1.01
Black/African American 115 0.18 0.97
Latino 88 0.13 0.91
Asian/Pacific Islander 29 0.25 0.82
Native American 13 -0.08 0.97
Other 18 0.35 1.08
Symbolic_Racism grouped by Ethnicity
Ethnicity N Mean SD
Caucasian/European origin 1237 0.02 0.98
Black/African American 115 -0.19 1.00
Latino 88 -0.15 0.99
Asian/Pacific Islander 29 0.11 1.15
Native American 13 0.30 1.70
Other 18 -0.16 1.24



3.7 Occupation




Homo_negativity grouped by Occupation
Occupation N Mean SD
Employed 768 0.06 0.99
Retired 268 -0.33 0.94
Unemployed 146 0.14 0.92
Parent 104 0.06 1.05
Disabled 98 -0.11 1.03
Student 85 0.31 1.06
Full-time caregiver 31 -0.04 1.06
Symbolic_Racism grouped by Occupation
Occupation N Mean SD
Employed 768 0.02 0.98
Retired 268 -0.11 1.00
Unemployed 146 0.03 1.02
Parent 104 0.00 1.05
Disabled 98 0.08 1.08
Student 85 0.01 0.97
Full-time caregiver 31 0.00 1.00



3.8 Area




Homo_negativity grouped by Area
Area N Mean SD
Urban 955 0.09 0.99
Rural 545 -0.16 1.00
Symbolic_Racism grouped by Area
Area N Mean SD
Urban 955 0.01 1.00
Rural 545 -0.01 0.99



3.9 Religious Affiliation




Homo_negativity grouped by Religious Affiliation
Religious Affiliation N Mean SD
Christian 1014 -0.20 0.95
Muslim 9 0.40 0.92
Jewish 52 0.21 1.06
Atheist/Agnostic 230 0.62 0.92
No religion 195 0.25 0.94
Symbolic_Racism grouped by Religious Affiliation
Religious Affiliation N Mean SD
Christian 1014 -0.03 1.00
Muslim 9 -0.69 1.16
Jewish 52 0.18 0.76
Atheist/Agnostic 230 -0.01 0.97
No religion 195 0.13 1.07



4 Political Behavior

4.1 Political Orientation

Correlation with General Conservatism, Economic Conservatism, Social Conservatism





  Political Orientation Social Political Orientation Economic Political Orientation Composite Political Orientation
Predictors Estimates CI p Estimates CI p Estimates CI p Estimates CI p
(Intercept) 5.31 5.20 – 5.41 <0.001 4.93 4.81 – 5.05 <0.001 5.48 5.36 – 5.60 <0.001 5.24 5.13 – 5.34 <0.001
Prejudice -1.21 -1.32 – -1.10 <0.001 -1.40 -1.52 – -1.28 <0.001 -1.08 -1.20 – -0.96 <0.001 -1.23 -1.34 – -1.13 <0.001
Observations 1500 1500 1500 1500
R2 / R2 adjusted 0.244 / 0.244 0.258 / 0.257 0.169 / 0.168 0.258 / 0.258



  Political Orientation Social Political Orientation Economic Political Orientation Composite Political Orientation
Predictors Estimates CI p Estimates CI p Estimates CI p Estimates CI p
(Intercept) 6.22 5.64 – 6.81 <0.001 6.06 5.43 – 6.69 <0.001 5.81 5.13 – 6.48 <0.001 6.03 5.46 – 6.60 <0.001
Prejudice -0.65 -0.73 – -0.57 <0.001 -0.70 -0.79 – -0.62 <0.001 -0.60 -0.69 – -0.51 <0.001 -0.65 -0.73 – -0.58 <0.001
Age 0.15 0.08 – 0.21 <0.001 0.14 0.07 – 0.21 <0.001 0.16 0.09 – 0.24 <0.001 0.15 0.09 – 0.21 <0.001
Income 0.10 0.05 – 0.16 <0.001 0.02 -0.05 – 0.08 0.625 0.15 0.08 – 0.21 <0.001 0.09 0.03 – 0.14 0.001
Religiosity 0.28 0.24 – 0.32 <0.001 0.39 0.35 – 0.43 <0.001 0.21 0.17 – 0.25 <0.001 0.29 0.26 – 0.33 <0.001
Education -0.08 -0.19 – 0.03 0.147 -0.11 -0.23 – 0.00 0.051 0.08 -0.05 – 0.20 0.231 -0.04 -0.14 – 0.06 0.454
Observations 1500 1500 1500 1500
R2 / R2 adjusted 0.357 / 0.355 0.408 / 0.406 0.253 / 0.251 0.383 / 0.381

4.2 Religiosity



4.3 Religiosity & Political Orientation


4.4 Candidate Preferences

4.4.1 Prejudice and Candidate Preferences [centered]

Candidate Preferences and Homo_negativity [centered]
Candidate Preference N Mean SD
Donald Trump 444 -0.53 0.87
Hillary Clinton 371 0.34 0.91
Bernie Sanders 362 0.59 0.91
Ted Cruz 122 -0.69 0.72
Jeb Bush 83 -0.20 0.83
Gary Johnson 68 0.13 0.86
Rand Paul 44 -0.35 0.81
Candidate Preferences and Symbolic_Racism [centered]
Candidate Preference N Mean SD
Donald Trump 444 0.03 1.08
Hillary Clinton 371 0.06 0.96
Bernie Sanders 362 -0.07 1.01
Ted Cruz 122 0.02 0.89
Jeb Bush 83 -0.06 0.85
Gary Johnson 68 -0.18 0.94
Rand Paul 44 0.04 1.15



4.4.2 Prejudice and Candidate Preferences [raw means]


4.5 Party Preferences

4.5.1 Party Preferences [centered]

Party Preferences and Homo_negativity [centered]
Party Preference N Mean SD
Republican Party 508 -0.47 0.84
Democratic Party 560 0.50 0.92
Libertarian Party 100 0.10 0.90
Green Party 40 0.87 0.89
Constitution Party 14 -0.44 0.83
Tea Party 68 -0.95 0.59
None 120 -0.04 0.91
Don't know 90 -0.11 0.91
Party Preferences and Symbolic_Racism [centered]
Party Preference N Mean SD
Republican Party 508 0.02 1.01
Democratic Party 560 -0.03 1.03
Libertarian Party 100 0.12 1.06
Green Party 40 0.18 0.98
Constitution Party 14 -0.36 0.80
Tea Party 68 0.03 0.85
None 120 -0.05 0.89
Don't know 90 -0.05 1.00


4.5.2 Party Preferences [raw means]

$kable
Party Preferences and Homo_negativity [raw means]
Party Preference N Mean SD
Republican Party 508 3.71 2.25
Democratic Party 560 6.31 2.47
Libertarian Party 100 5.26 2.42
Green Party 40 7.30 2.38
Constitution Party 14 3.79 2.23
Tea Party 68 2.43 1.58
None 120 4.87 2.44
Don’t know 90 4.69 2.45
$kable
Party Preferences and Symbolic_Racism [raw means]
Party Preference N Mean SD
Republican Party 508 4.60 1.14
Democratic Party 560 4.55 1.16
Libertarian Party 100 4.72 1.19
Green Party 40 4.78 1.10
Constitution Party 14 4.18 0.90
Tea Party 68 4.61 0.95
None 120 4.52 1.00
Don’t know 90 4.53 1.12


4.6 Voting

Prejudice Candidate Preferences
  2016 [Trump vs. Clinton] 2016 [Trump vs. Clinton] + Supporters 2012 [Romney vs. Obama] 2008 [McCain vs. Obama]
Predictors Log-Odds CI p Log-Odds CI p Log-Odds CI p Log-Odds CI p
(Intercept) 0.020 -Inf – Inf 0.741 0.004 -Inf – Inf 0.948 0.137 -Inf – Inf 0.016 0.160 -Inf – Inf 0.006
Prejudice 0.001 -Inf – Inf 0.991 -0.012 -Inf – Inf 0.835 -0.081 -Inf – Inf 0.156 -0.096 -Inf – Inf 0.098
Observations 1103 1148 1236 1206
R2 Tjur 0.000 0.000 0.002 0.002


4.7 Party Identity

Homo_negativity and Party Identity
Donald Trump Hilary Clinton
Strong Republican 282 7
Republican 166 24
Leaning Republican 58 7
Independent 17 16
Leaning Democrat 10 65
Democrat 27 129
Strong Democrat 4 323
Symbolic_Racism and Party Identity
Donald Trump Hilary Clinton
Strong Republican 282 7
Republican 166 24
Leaning Republican 58 7
Independent 17 16
Leaning Democrat 10 65
Democrat 27 129
Strong Democrat 4 323

4.8 Voting & Party Identity

  2016 [Clinton vs. Trump] 2016 [Trump vs. Clinton] + Supporters
Predictors Odds Ratios CI p Odds Ratios CI p
(Intercept) 0.96 0.42 – 2.26 0.923 1.03 0.47 – 2.31 0.947
Party Identity (dichotomous) 0.01 0.00 – 0.01 <0.001
Party Identity (dichotomous) 1.73 1.46 – 2.06 <0.001 1.64 1.40 – 1.92 <0.001
Prejudice 0.01 0.01 – 0.01 <0.001
Observations 1103 1148
R2 Tjur 0.758 0.731



4.9 Likeability

4.10 Trump’s likeability




4.11 Clinton’s likeability





4.12 Johnson’s Likeability



5 Politico-Psychological correlates of Prejudice

5.1 Ideologies and Partisanship



5.2 Populism, Nationalism, Nativism, and Patriotism



5.3 Political Psychology

5.4 Social Justice Concerns, Empathy, and Prejudice



5.5 Values



5.6 Pot-Pourri



5.7 Positive and Negative correlates of Prejudice

5.7.1 Positive Correlates

5.7.2 Negative Correlates

5.8 Section Summary


5.8.1 Interaction with Social Dominance and System Justification

  Homo-negativity Homo-negativity Homo-negativity Homo-negativity Homo-negativity
Predictors Estimates CI p Estimates CI p Estimates CI p Estimates CI p Estimates CI p
(Intercept) 1.84 1.50 – 2.18 <0.001 -1.08 -1.46 – -0.70 <0.001 3.89 3.35 – 4.42 <0.001 -0.41 -0.99 – 0.17 0.166 0.65 0.14 – 1.16 0.012
Social Dominance Orientation 0.85 0.77 – 0.93 <0.001
Right-Wing Authoritarianism 1.17 1.10 – 1.25 <0.001
System Justification 0.22 0.12 – 0.33 <0.001
Economic System Justification 1.13 1.01 – 1.24 <0.001
Gender-specific System Justification 0.80 0.71 – 0.90 <0.001
Observations 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500
R2 / R2 adjusted 0.208 / 0.208 0.415 / 0.414 0.012 / 0.012 0.190 / 0.190 0.168 / 0.168
  Symbolic Racism Symbolic Racism Symbolic Racism Symbolic Racism Symbolic Racism
Predictors Estimates CI p Estimates CI p Estimates CI p Estimates CI p Estimates CI p
(Intercept) 2.50 2.23 – 2.78 <0.001 0.80 0.46 – 1.13 <0.001 4.33 3.89 – 4.77 <0.001 -0.41 -0.99 – 0.17 0.166 1.36 0.95 – 1.78 <0.001
Social Dominance Orientation 0.76 0.70 – 0.83 <0.001
Right-Wing Authoritarianism 0.88 0.82 – 0.94 <0.001
System Justification 0.20 0.12 – 0.29 <0.001
Economic System Justification 1.13 1.01 – 1.24 <0.001
Gender-specific System Justification 0.74 0.66 – 0.81 <0.001
Observations 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500
R2 / R2 adjusted 0.245 / 0.244 0.338 / 0.338 0.015 / 0.014 0.190 / 0.190 0.205 / 0.204




5.8.2 Interaction between Social Dominance Orientation and Prejudice


5.8.3 Summary of Regression Models

Observations 1500
Dependent variable facet
Type OLS linear regression
F(1,1498) 394.45
0.21
Adj. R² 0.21
Est. S.E. t val. p
(Intercept) 1.84 0.17 10.70 0.00
SDO 0.85 0.04 19.86 0.00
Standard errors: OLS
Observations 1500
Dependent variable facet
Type OLS linear regression
F(1,1498) 485.10
0.24
Adj. R² 0.24
Est. S.E. t val. p
(Intercept) 2.50 0.14 18.02 0.00
SDO 0.76 0.03 22.03 0.00
Standard errors: OLS